h1

Essay: “Were the destructive impacts of World War II balanced by more positive effects in world history?”

Sunday, December 23, 2007

In this essay I will address the question “Were the destructive impacts of World War II balanced by more positive effects in world history?”. This question poses some serious moral and ethical issues: is jet propulsion worth 50 million deaths(Hause and Maltby 2005, p.770)? Is it even right to ask such a question? The answers to these questions are dependent upon the context in which they are viewed. From a humanities standpoint, no, the developments were for the most part not worth such destruction. Those that were worth it, such as decolonisation and the end of empire, would have occurred anyway. However, when viewed from an engineering/scientific angle, war does serve a purpose. It gives people a real thing to work towards and it speeds up advancement, probably by a factor of 10. It is quite feasible to say that the technology of today would not have existed for perhaps another 50 years. This essay will take the humanities standpoint.

Let us start with a brief outline of the destructive impacts. The loss of life is the most obvious with various estimates ranging from 50 million to 75 million dead. The Australian War Memorial lists 56,307,334 although this figure is only comprised of Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Poland, South Africa, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. The bombings of cities like Dresden, Tokyo, London, Coventry and others led to tremendous loss of civilian life, as well as cultural value and did little, if anything, to military forces. These attacks were nothing more than attempts, often successful, at terrorising the civilian populace. The holocaust of course cannot go unmentioned: a hideous example of what mankind is capable of, an estimated 11 million killed, 6 million of whom were Jews, all in the name of racial purity (Hause and Maltby 2005, p.766).

Now a brief outline of the technological advancements made during or as a result of World War Two. These advancements were made by both the Axis powers and the Allies. Rocketry moved from a spectacle to a billion dollar industry and the back bone of the modern world. Computers stopped being mechanical adding machines with cogs and gears and became huge vacuum tube and capacitor filled rooms and then too, the microchip filled boxes of today. Jet propulsion was propelled from patents and proof of concept prototypes to the standard purveyor of flight. Nuclear fission has gone from pure theory to the basis of weapons of deterrence and an inefficient way to boil water. Radar evolved from massive ineffective detection systems to smaller, highly accurate detection systems that can pick up a plan from kilometres away.

The cultural plundering that went on during World War Two is sometimes overlooked. Artworks such as Caravaggio’s ‘Saint Matthew and the Angel’(Schmidt 1997 p.96), Peter Paul Rubens’ ‘The Death of Adonis’(Sailer 1997, p.90), Lorenzo di Credi’s ‘Madonna and Child with Angels’(Pruszyñski 1997 p.52) and others were stolen, “misplaced” or destroyed. Buildings of religion and learning were destroyed or mistreated, like the State Museum of History in Novgorod, Russia, which was used as a barracks after the German army captured the city (Shvidkoi 1997 p.70).

As was fleetingly mentioned in a previous paragraph, the holocaust is one of, if not the most, disturbing event in human history. It caused the deaths of an estimated 11 million people including, 1,500 Jehovah’s Witnesses, 3.3 million Soviet prisoners of war(USHMM), 5,000 homosexuals, 200,000 gypsies and almost 6 million Jewish people, 1.5 million of whom were children(Hause and Maltby 2005, p.766). The death toll could have been higher if not for efforts by the likes of André Trocmé and Marie Benoît who saved 5,000 and 4,000 Jews, by hiding and helping them to escape respectively(Hause and Maltby 2005, p.767). The Allies refused to do so much as bomb the railroad tracks leading to Auschwitz, even though they bombed factories in the vicinity.

Technological advancements were not the only positives to come out of the hideousness of the Second World War; it brought an end to the depression and started the downfall of traditional empires. The United Nations was formed as a result of the League of Nations total inability to prevent World War Two. While the United Nations is largely powerless and ineffective, the programs it runs such as UNICEF(United Nations Children’s Fund) and WHO(World Health Organization) are beneficial and perform valuable tasks that help millions of people around the world.

When I started this essay, it was being written with an answer of ‘Yes the positives do outweigh the negatives’. However, as I went on researching the death toll and such, I found myself feeling ashamed at taking such an view. All the good things to come out of the war, such as ending the depression, the end of empire, the United Nations, and the technology, would have happened anyway. The League of Nations was failing, even before the war started and would have been replaced, if not by the United Nations, then by something similar. The economy would have strengthened, they tend to be go through cycles, and the seeds of independence had been sown and while it might have taken longer, colonial empires would have ended. The technology would have been invented, the war merely gave the scientists working on them something to strive for, and gave them field testing to see what was wrong. All these things would have happened without the Second World War, and they therefore, should not have cost such a hefty price.

BIBLIOGRAPY:

Secondary Sources:
Steven C. Hause and William S. Maltby, ‘Western Civilization: A history of European society’. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 2005.

Australian War Memorial website
Homepage: http://www.awm.gov.au/index.asp
Statistics: http://www.awm.gov.au/atwar/statistics/ww2.htm

Elizabeth Simpson, ‘The Spoils of War’. Harry N. Abrams inc, New York, 1997.
Contributors referenced:
Jan P. Pruszyñski, ‘Poland: The War Losses, Cultural Heritage, and Cultural Legitimacy p.49-52
Mikhail Shvidkoi, ‘Russian Cultural Losses During World War II’ p.67-71
Gerhard Sailer, ‘Austria’ p.88-91
Werner Schmidt, ‘The Loss of German Artistic Property as a Result of World War II’ p.95-98

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum website
Homepage: http://www.ushmm.org/
Articles referenced:
Nazi Persecution of Soviet POWs
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10007178

Jehovah’s Witnesses
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005394

h1

Review: Stargate SG-1 S01 E07

Friday, December 21, 2007

Episode Title: The Nox

Synopsis(Link to Stargate Wiki)

The Nox are unbelievable awesome. This “review” will basically be about the Nox. They are pacifists almost to a fault, and yet I don’t dislike them like I do most pacifists. Some of their lines rank very highly on my list of favourite Stargate quotes.

<Opher takes some sap from a tree, tastes it then offers it to Daniel> ”You?”
<Daniel>  ”No thank you, I’m trying to, quit?”

<Opher> “How old am I? How do you mark time?”
<Daniel> ”Years, days, uh… A day is one revolution of our planet. A tear is one revolution around our sun. There are 365 days in a year, so…”
<Opher> ”Then I am 432 years old.”
<Daniel> “Well, uh… you look great.”
<Opher> “…Thank you.”

<Daniel> ”Why did you not bury the Stargate? Do you know that that would stop the?”
<Opher> “And they would know someone had buried it.”
<Daniel> “Right, of course”

<Anteaus> “The very young do not always do what they are told.”

<Anteaus> ”Maybe one day you will learn that your way is not the only way.”

The Nox sadly only appear in two further episodes and even then only Lya. They do however get mentioned as one of the Four Great Races. 10/10

h1

Review: Stargate SG-1 S01 E06

Friday, December 21, 2007

Episode Title: Cold Lazarus

Synopsis(Link to Stargate Wiki) 

The concept of energy based lifeforms not knowing that corporeal beings die and after they do, they are dead is just a little bit close to Deep Space Nines “The Emisary”. Though Jack getting over his sons death… no he didn’t really get over it. Well whatever happened was good. Teal’cs reaction to the music was very similar to my reaction to the past decade of music.

Once again nothing really wrong with the episode it’s just boring.
3/10 I found it just a smidge more boring than the last one.

h1

Review: Stargate SG-1 S01 E05

Friday, December 21, 2007

Episode Title: The First Commandment

Synopsis(Link to Stargate Wiki)

Well it wasn’t until SG-1 had set up camp that I thought of anything to write. The army ration joke was clichéd and yet still funny. When Carter says “The cave dwellers must have loved him for that” it doesn’t sound like Amanda Tapping, why? Is it Amanda Tapping only speaking differently? Did they have to loop the dialogue and used a different actress? And yes a number of things happen over 7 days in the bible, and 40, be it days or years. This is a clear sign that God is a fan of Star Tre… sorry wrong series. I couldn’t really think of anything to say after the camp scene either.

4/10 not bad, just boring.

h1

Oh How Clichéd

Monday, December 17, 2007

I’m depressed. It’s the Christmas season and I’m depressed. That is such a cliché that it pisses me off, and then depresses me even further. I don’t even know why I’m depressed, I think I’m bored and my brain has decided to turn off ‘happy’ in order to give it something to do.

But hey enough about that.

…I got nothing.

Maybe I should get a hobby. Something fun, time consuming, cheap and I’m able to do. I think I’ll start actively tearing apart ‘bullshit’, just taking it and shredding it, it and whom ever created it. Then after I’m done with that, I’ll take them aside, and teach them how to ‘bullshit’ correctly. Now I have been doing this already in day to day life, but I think now I’ll go out and seek ‘bullshit’ out and tear it apart.

On a side note, what’s up with the WordPress admin bar thingy? On the right hand side it says “Howdy, Aaron. [Sign Out, My Profile]“. I mean christ it makes me feel like even my own blog* doesn’t want me around.

*Personally I hate the word blog, but what else can you say? Internet thought page? Website?

h1

Review: Stargate SG-1 S01 E04

Monday, December 10, 2007

Episode Title: The Broca Divide

Synopsis(link to Stargate Wiki)

Everybody with the obvious exception of the non-military Daniel and Teal’c are in dress uniform, which strikes me as odd because there doesn’t appear to be any dignitaries or guests around, well the marines are there but being SG-3 they wouldn’t be guests. I’m not saying they should be in full BDU but why aren’t they in day dress or work wear, whatever you want to call it, as they are in other episodes? They can’t get an image of the other side because the lights were out and it was very dark but surely the US military could afford a decent camera?

In the ”Land of Light” is it perpetual daylight or does night fall? I guess it must be perpetual day or it wouldn’t be the land of light. The brown tank top with bare midrift is a huge improvement over the hideous blue dress. This episode marks the first appearance of Dr Janet Fraiser played by Teryl Rothery, where she saves the SGC from certain doom for the first of what will become many times.  The notes I wrote for this review are short, because half way through the episode I decided to get something to eat and didn’t pause it because I thought I would be quicker.

For some reason I can’t stop with the Star Trek analogies but, Teal’c is kinda like Data, that is if Data were a karge black man with wit drying than a desert.

6/10

Quotes:

“Maybe I have some kind of natural immunity”
“Perhaps you will develope symptoms later”
“Thank you for the moral support”
Daniel and Teal’c discussing the virus.

h1

Review: Stargate SG-1 S01 E03

Monday, December 10, 2007

Episode Title: Emancipation

Synopsis(Link to Stargate Wiki)

Mongol culture made for an interesting backdrop for the episode. The continuous overstating of Amanda Tappings beauty got old fast, yes she’s an attractive woman but not as much as the punk ass kid made her out to be. And the way Daniel, Jack and Teal’c react when she puts on what has to be the ugliest blue dress in the history of science fiction is just ridiculous. I mean if she were showing some midrift like in the next episode I could see that reaction as plausible.

The high points of the episode would be the actors who portrayed the chiefs, Soon-Tek Oh as Moughal the good chief and Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa as Turghan the evil chief.

This episode is about the chauvanistic culture dealing with Carter. The main plot is gender equality, oh look it’s a plot from 1971! Slavery was thrown in as a B plot. Why is it that American writers keep writing stories appologising for slavery adn yet don’t appologise. The wrost part about this episode has been deciding to give it a 1/10 or a 0/10?

So to make up time because I’m not even half way through the episode, It’s tangent time. The redish brown blanket with green stripe that appears behind carter at 0:28:51 is an Australian Army surpluss blanket. Well my father says that it is, it could just be dyed that way. Either way they spent little on it, dying and raiding a disposal store are on the same level of cost, a smidge above nothing. Personally I’m going to side with my dad because well, it’s more interesting.

0.5/10

Quotes:

“What is an Oprah” – Teal’c

h1

Review: Stargate SG-1 S01 E02

Monday, December 10, 2007

Episode Title: The Enemy Within

Synopsis (link to Wikipedia) (I link to the Wikipedia entries because I’m terrible an synopsising, they end up either a single sentence or an entire page.)

Starting off with a vaudevillian, “No, no, no, you go ahead” “Oh but you were here first” bit between O’Neill and Kawalsky, with Hammond again showing his father figure role by telling them to stop, and that they’ll go where he tell them. The Iris has unfortunately aged badly and looks flat, and appears to be a circular plane with a texture on it. The surgery was well executed and tense. Colonel Kennedy was what you would expect from an intelligentce officer, paranoid, arrogant and amoral.

Over all a slower paced, less action, story driven episode, that I didn’t enjoy as much as the pilot but I still liked it.

5/10

Quotes:

“They’ll be in for a suprise”
“Your iris will be closed, they will be crushed.”
“Suprise”
-Jack and Teal’c discussing the Goa’uld

h1

Review: Stargate SG-1 S01 E01

Monday, December 3, 2007

Episode Title: Children of the Gods

Synopsis (link to Wikipedia)

The episode started off well with the mysterious appearance of an alien and his guards coming to earth to kidnap a woman for an unknown and sinister purpose. The sheet used to cover the gate was sucked back behind it has the gate started turning, but personally I think it would have been cooler if it had been disintegrated by the “kawoosh”. That would have been a nice subtle way to illustrate how dangerous the “kawoosh” is, but it would have been impossible to pull off without CG which was expensive in 1997. General Hammond appeared to have a sort of smirk like grin when threatening to bomb Abydos, almost like he knew Jackson was living there. The writing for Samantha Carter was at least for the briefing scene where she first makes an appearance, very boring and overly feminist, something even Amanda Tapping admits too. I did like when O’Neil told her that he has no problem with her being a woman, it’s that she’s a scientist that he doesn’t like.

I quite liked the keyboard used to dial the gate which had the alpha-numerics replaced with the gate symbols. When they first step through the gate the team has frost on them, a side effect of gate travel, this is seen again later when they go to Chulak, but is soon abandoned for unknown reasons. In my opinion instead of just abandoning it they should have had it so the frost only happens for your first 10 trips by which time you’ve acclimated to gate travel, which would explain why Apophis and his Serpent Guards do not have frost on them when they arrive on Earth.

Michael Shanks is a great actor as shown in future episodes, but not so much here. Not to say his performance was bad, it just wasn’t as good as he eventually became. The evening meal scene was corny and poorly executed. Christopher Judge played Teal’c as this odd kind of mix between a calm, centred, logical Vulcan and an unstoppable Klingon. Richard Dean Anderson convincingly (to me at least) played a seasoned soldier with a refined sense of humour. Amanda Tapping did the best she could with the horrible writing for her character and did quite well. Peter Williams managed to make Apophis flamboyantly evil yet still a terrifying adversary(in my notes I wrote something before terrifying but even I can’t read my chicken scratch). Hammond already appeared to show his father like role when concerned for the team.

The music was scored beautifully in this episode, something that continued through out the series. The distortion of the voices for the Goa’uld was hit and miss, while Peter Williams sounded awesome as Apophis, especially when he said “Lovely” when viewing the Sargent kidnapped at the beginning, the other Goa’uld sounded weak, and almost as thought the distortion was an afterthought. When Teal’c removed his obviously rubber armour after betraying Apophis, he drops it on the ground with a loud audible clank. The use of model and effect shots from the film in order to save money caused repetition and errors, for instance when the hatch opens to drop the rings from the Death Glider, it is clearly the ceiling of a large stone room and not the underside of a fighter. The rings themselves look dated and un-detailed. Some of the muzzle-flashes look like the cameres weren’t synced up and added in post.

Quotes:

“You.” - Teal’c

“Another fine day on planet Kawalsky.” - Major Charles Kawalsky

All in all a good start to a great series, earning:

7/10

h1

Why I don’t want an iPhone

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Calling the iPhone crap in my last post may have been a bit harsh. It’s not that it’s crap, it’s just… it’s like if you dressed a simpleton with stumps for hands up in a tweed suit and lab coat, just cause it looks like a scientist, doesn’t mean it can turn the bunsen burner on, or distil the water to bring to boil by waving it over said burner. Sure it looks nice with its coverflow and chrome, but it DOESN’T EVEN HAVE COPY PASTE FUNCTIONALITY!

For most of my life I’ve had a love hate relationship with Apple, due to some issues that I won’t bother going into. I also have a tendency to go against the views of the dominant person/group where I am. At school surrounded by hardcore PC people most of which were also artists, I would tell them just how great a Mac would be for them. Yet while getting a diploma of multimedia, the teacher was a hardcore Mac cultist, and I would insult him, and he would insult me, we were very alike really, although he liked Macs, was from Melbourne and was into skateboarding, and I liked PCs, am from Sydney and detest skateboarding and skateboarders.

I think Steve Jobs is to blame for my negative feelings towards Apple, him and his bloody Reality Distortion Field, even I got caught in it while watching the WWDC 2007 keynote, thankfully iTunes and Safari for Windows came along and blasted me back out to safety. I miss the old caddy you had to use for CDs on Macs.

Also the iPhone could be costing AU$750-1000 when it finally get released, and I just don’t use my mobile that much to warrant that much expense. I’m sad, pathetic have few friends, why would I need such a fantastic device that’s just so easy to use to contact them, hell my cheap shitty Telstra pre-paid that I’ve had for 2-3 years died(not so much died as Telstra were being shitty and my credit was disappearing like a week after I recharged it) in October and I haven’t replaced it because well I need to decided whether I want to spend $149 on a phone that I kinda want, $129 on a phone I kinda want, or $59 on a phone I don’t want but hey I need a phone. Maybe iTunes is a reason, I don’t want my phone to be controlled by a glorified spreadsheet program with a bar on the left with a folder tree system thingy in it.

Whatever the reason I just don’t want an iPhone, and as this rant has gone on for 439 words so far, hasn’t really said what I wanted it to say, and gone off on some tangents, I think I’ll finish it up now.